datehookup review

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage


The current research examined the observed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith dating and marriage. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) What is the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) how can the participants feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) How do the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that most the individuals had been impacted by the pressure that is social upon them. More over, the individuals identified the generation that is previous “racist”. Nevertheless, interestingly you will find signs and symptoms of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 per cent of this individuals would not like to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The rest of the 20 per cent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.

This might be a preview of membership content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Purchase solitary article

Immediate access to your full article PDF.

Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.

Donate to journal

Immediate on the web access to all the presssing problems from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.


It must be noted that dating is generally speaking perhaps perhaps maybe not appropriate within the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention will be date solely (nevertheless, particular limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the make an effort to get married. Furthermore, in many cases, the approval for the female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is needed seriously to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed through the number of the info so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and observing that is religious.


Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, as well as the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–۱۴۴). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–۴۴۷٫

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a test that is longitudinal of contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–۲۰۰۰٫ Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing qualitative information: Thematic analysis and rule development. Nyc, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using analysis that is thematic therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–۱۰۱٫

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim adults: The part of religiosity, social identification, and household connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of datehookup sign in tradition. United states Psychologist, 64, 194–۲۰۴٫

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex as well as the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–۵۹٫

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and love that is romantic the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–۱۰٫

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and intimate relationships. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–۳۲۲٫

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–۴۴۰٫

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–۱۵٫

Felmlee, D. (2003). Conversation in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–۴۰۹). Ny: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate partners’ perceptions of social networking features aided by the passing of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–۳۴۰٫

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of competition for initiating a connection. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–۶۴٫

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors in the collection of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–۶۲۷٫

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–۴۲۱٫

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of Women in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: an approach that is interactionist mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–۴۱۸٫

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to develop and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–۶۴٫

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies additionally the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt reduction theory. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–۷۹٫

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication systems and also the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt reduction concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–۷۹٫

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–۱۶۱٫

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social support determinants of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–۳۲۸٫

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social support systems on intimate relationships: Through the lens for the myspace and facebook. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–۶۴۴٫

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative perspective. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever education fulfills conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards peace education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–۳۲۰٫

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not totally all love affairs are designed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.

0 نظر

    دیدگاهی ارسال نشده است!

نظر دهید